Head to head · specs cited · drawn to scale
Canon Canonet QL17 GIII vs Olympus Stylus Epic / mju-II
Every spec below is quoted from the makers' official pages — where a figure isn't published we say so rather than guess. Sizes are drawn at true relative scale from published dimensions, and the bag-fit row is computed against our measured bag catalog.
The 3 biggest published differences
- Weight (body): the mju-II leads at 145 g vs the Canonet QL17's 620 g.
- Type: Canonet QL17 has 35mm rangefinder; mju-II has 35mm compact.
- Lens mount: Canonet QL17 has fixed 40mm f/1.7; mju-II has fixed 35mm f/2.8.
Canonet QL17 fixed | mju-II fixed | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Type | 35mm rangefinder | 35mm compact |
| Format | 35mm | 35mm |
| Lens mount | fixed 40mm f/1.7 | fixed 35mm f/2.8 |
| Released | 1972–1982 | 1997-2002 |
| Film camera | ||
| Film format | 35mm | 35mm |
| Metering | CdS cell, shutter-priority AE with manual override | Automatic multi-segment exposure tied to autofocus zones, EV 1-17 (no official manufacturer metering-system name published) |
| Shutter | Leaf shutter in lens | Programmed electromagnetic lens-shutter (fixed-lens leaf shutter), fully automatic |
| Shutter speeds | 1/4 s – 1/500 + B | 4 sec to 1/1000 sec, paired with aperture f/2.8-f/11 in program AE |
| Battery | 1× PX625 1.3 V mercury (meter only) | 1x 3V lithium CR123A (or DL123A equivalent) |
| Body & Handling | ||
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 120 × 75 × 60 mm | 108 × 59 × 35 mm |
| Weight (body) | 620 g | 145 g |
| Weather sealing | —, not published | —, not published |
| Shutter durability | —, not published | —, not published |
| Price | ||
| Launch price | —, not published | —, not published |
| Size, to scale | ||
Front view, drawn at the same scale from each maker's published W×H (mm). | ||
| Smallest bag that fits | ||
| Body | Think Tank Mirrorless Mover 20 V2 Fits body only · View at B&H Photo Video | Think Tank Mirrorless Mover 20 V2 Fits body only · View at B&H Photo Video |
Sources
mju-II dimensions carry medium confidence (archived-source caveat on its fit page).
Spec values are the manufacturers' published figures, compared factually — we don't rank cameras. Fit verdicts are planning estimates from published interior dimensions, not guarantees. See methodology.
Feedback
Did this page help?
One tap tells us whether this fit page is useful.