Methodology

Every number is cited. Every verdict is a planning estimate from published dimensions — not a guarantee.

Where the numbers come from

Every figure carries a source record with the URL, access date, and a verbatim excerpt.

How the fit is modeled

  1. Each gear item becomes a bounding box in millimetres — a body is [width, height, depth]; a lens is a cylinder, so its box is [diameter, diameter, length].
  2. A bag compartment is a box [interior width, interior height, interior depth]. Tapered inserts publish a depth range; we use the smaller depth to test physical fit and the average depth for capacity.
  3. We subtract a small clearance (5 mm) from each compartment edge for padding and dividers.
  4. Individual fit: every item must fit the compartment in at least one orientation (rotation allowed).
  5. Capacity: we compare the kit's total bounding-box volume against the compartment's usable volume (its interior volume × a packing-efficiency factor of 0.62 that reflects real dead space between round lenses in a rectangular box).

The verdict scale

VerdictMeaning
Fits with roomEvery item fits and there is comfortable spare capacity.
Tight — measure carefullyEverything fits, but with little spare room. Check against your exact gear.
Exceeds the published interiorAt least one item won't fit, or the kit is larger than the compartment.
UnverifiedWe lack a published dimension we trust enough to compute a verdict.

Why it is not a guarantee

Bags flex, dividers move, and manufacturers occasionally change interior dimensions between versions without renaming a product. We report from published specifications and do not measure every sample. Treat a verdict as a decision aid backed by the retailer's return policy. Our calibration is deliberately conservative, so borderline cases are called "tight" rather than "fits".

Feedback

Did this page help?

One tap tells us whether this fit page is useful.