Head to head · specs cited · drawn to scale
Contax T2 vs Olympus OM-1 (film)
Every spec below is quoted from the makers' official pages — where a figure isn't published we say so rather than guess. Sizes are drawn at true relative scale from published dimensions, and the bag-fit row is computed against our measured bag catalog.
The 3 biggest published differences
- Weight (body): the T2 leads at 295 g vs the OM-1's 490 g.
- Type: T2 has 35mm compact; OM-1 has 35mm SLR.
- Lens mount: T2 has fixed 38mm f/2.8 (Carl Zeiss Sonnar T*); OM-1 has Olympus OM.
T2 fixed | OM-1 Olympus OM | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Type | 35mm compact | 35mm SLR |
| Format | 35mm | 35mm |
| Lens mount | fixed 38mm f/2.8 (Carl Zeiss Sonnar T*) | Olympus OM |
| Released | 1990-1994 | 1972-1988 |
| Film camera | ||
| Film format | 35mm | 35mm |
| Metering | External SPD-cell metering, EV3-EV17 at ISO 100 | Through-the-lens CdS exposure meter, needle in viewfinder, center-weighted |
| Shutter | Electronic, programmed AE electromagnetic shutter integral to the fixed lens (not interchangeable) | Horizontal-travel focal-plane shutter, fully mechanical |
| Shutter speeds | Program AE: 1-1/500 sec; Aperture priority: 1-1/200 sec (max varies with aperture); flash sync 1/30-1/500 sec | B, 1 sec to 1/1000 sec |
| Battery | 1x 3V lithium (CR123A or DL123A) | 1x 1.35V mercury cell (originally PX625, meter only; camera fires without battery) |
| Body & Handling | ||
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 119 × 66 × 33 mm | 136 × 83 × 50 mm |
| Weight (body) | 295 g | 490 g |
| Weather sealing | —, not published | —, not published |
| Shutter durability | —, not published | —, not published |
| Price | ||
| Launch price | —, not published | —, not published |
| Size, to scale | ||
Front view, drawn at the same scale from each maker's published W×H (mm). | ||
| Smallest bag that fits | ||
| Body | Think Tank Mirrorless Mover 20 V2 Fits body only · View at B&H Photo Video | Think Tank Mirrorless Mover 20 V2 Fits body only · View at B&H Photo Video |
Sources
OM-1 dimensions carry medium confidence (archived-source caveat on its fit page).
Spec values are the manufacturers' published figures, compared factually — we don't rank cameras. Fit verdicts are planning estimates from published interior dimensions, not guarantees. See methodology.
Feedback
Did this page help?
One tap tells us whether this fit page is useful.