Head to head · specs cited · drawn to scale
Hasselblad 500C/M vs Mamiya RB67 Pro-S
Every spec below is quoted from the makers' official pages — where a figure isn't published we say so rather than guess. Sizes are drawn at true relative scale from published dimensions, and the bag-fit row is computed against our measured bag catalog.
The 3 biggest published differences
- Weight (body): the 500C/M leads at 968 g vs the RB67 Pro-S's 2705 g.
- Format: 500C/M has 120 (6×6); RB67 Pro-S has 120 (6×7).
- Lens mount: 500C/M has Hasselblad V-system bayonet mount; RB67 Pro-S has Mamiya RB bayonet mount (with safety lock ring).
500C/M Hasselblad V mount | RB67 Pro-S Mamiya RB mount | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Type | Medium-format SLR | Medium-format SLR |
| Format | 120 (6×6) | 120 (6×7) |
| Lens mount | Hasselblad V-system bayonet mount | Mamiya RB bayonet mount (with safety lock ring) |
| Released | 1970–1994 | 1974–1990 (Pro-S variant) |
| Film camera | ||
| Film format | 120 (6×6) | 120 (6×7) |
| Metering | none (no built-in meter; waist-level finder has no metering capability) | none (no built-in meter) |
| Shutter | In-lens Synchro-Compur/Prontor leaf shutter (per-lens, not body) | Seiko #1 leaf (lens) shutter, 1 to 1/400 sec and T |
| Shutter speeds | 1 sec – 1/500 sec, B | 1 – 1/400 sec, T |
| Battery | none (fully mechanical) | none (fully mechanical) |
| Body & Handling | ||
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 170 × 109 × 104 mm | 104 × 144 × 228 mm |
| Weight (body) | 968 g | 2705 g |
| Weather sealing | —, not published | —, not published |
| Shutter durability | —, not published | —, not published |
| Price | ||
| Launch price | —, not published | —, not published |
| Size, to scale | ||
Front view, drawn at the same scale from each maker's published W×H (mm). | ||
| Smallest bag that fits | ||
| Body | WANDRD ROGUE 6L Sling V2 Fits body only · View at WANDRD | f-stop Shallow Medium ICU Fits body only · View at f-stop |
Sources
500C/M dimensions carry low confidence (archived-source caveat on its fit page).
Spec values are the manufacturers' published figures, compared factually — we don't rank cameras. Fit verdicts are planning estimates from published interior dimensions, not guarantees. See methodology.
Feedback
Did this page help?
One tap tells us whether this fit page is useful.