Head to head · specs cited · drawn to scale
Nikon Z fc vs Ricoh GR III
Every spec below is quoted from the makers' official pages — where a figure isn't published we say so rather than guess. Sizes are drawn at true relative scale from published dimensions, and the bag-fit row is computed against our measured bag catalog.
The 3 biggest published differences
- Resolution (MP): the Zfc leads at 20.9 million (effective) vs the GR III's Approx. 24.24 megapixels (effective).
- Weight (body): the GR III leads at 257 g vs the Zfc's 445 g.
- Battery life (CIPA): the Zfc leads at Approx. 300 shots (CIPA) vs the GR III's Approx. 200 images (CIPA standard).
GR III fixed | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Type | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Format | 23.5 x 15.7 mm CMOS sensor (Nikon DX format) | APS-C 23.5mm x 15.6mm |
| Lens mount | Nikon Z | fixed |
| Released | —, not published | —, not published |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | Primary color filter CMOS (anti-aliasing filterless) |
| Sensor size | 23.5 x 15.7 mm CMOS sensor (Nikon DX format) | APS-C 23.5mm x 15.6mm |
| Resolution (MP) | 20.9 million (effective) | Approx. 24.24 megapixels (effective) |
| In-body stabilisation | none | Sensor-shift shake reduction (SR) (3-axis); 4 steps (CIPA standard) |
| ISO range | ISO 100-51200 (expandable to ISO 204800 equivalent) | ISO 100-102400 |
| Autofocus & Speed | ||
| AF system | Hybrid phase-detection/contrast AF with AF assist | Hybrid AF (Image plane phase-matching and Contrast detection) |
| Subject detection | 209 focus points; auto-area AF with people and animal (eye) detection | Auto-area, Zone, Select, Pinpoint, Tracking, Continuous, MF, Snap, infinity |
| Burst — mechanical | Approx. 5 fps (Continuous H); approx. 11 fps (Continuous H extended) | —, not published |
| Burst — electronic | —, not published | —, not published |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 3840 x 2160 (4K UHD): 30p/25p/24p | Full HD (1920x1080, 60p/30p/24p) |
| Codecs / sampling | H.264/MPEG-4 Advanced Video Coding; MOV, MP4 | MPEG4 AVC/H.264 (MOV) |
| Recording limit | —, not published | Up to 25 minutes or 4GB |
| Viewfinder & Screen | ||
| EVF resolution | Approx. 2360k-dot (XGA) OLED | none (no EVF) |
| EVF magnification | Approx. 1.02x | none (no EVF) |
| Rear screen | 7.5-cm/3.0-in., approx. 1040k-dot vari-angle TFT touch-sensitive LCD | 3.0 inch TFT color LCD touchscreen, approx. 1037K dots (fixed) |
| Body & Handling | ||
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 134.5 × 93.5 × 43.5 mm | 109.4 × 61.9 × 33.2 mm |
| Weight (body) | 445 g | 257 g |
| Weather sealing | —, not published | —, not published |
| Shutter durability | —, not published | —, not published |
| Power & Storage | ||
| Battery life (CIPA) | Approx. 300 shots (CIPA) | Approx. 200 images (CIPA standard) |
| Battery | EN-EL25 | Rechargeable Battery DB-110 |
| Card slots | One slot: SD (UHS-I compliant SDHC/SDXC) | Internal Memory (Approx. 2GB), SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Card |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB | Type C USB connector (SuperSpeed USB) | USB Type-C |
| Wireless | Wi-Fi IEEE 802.11b/g/n; Bluetooth Specification Version 4.2 | Wi-Fi IEEE 802.11b/g/n; Bluetooth v4.2 BLE |
| HDMI | Type D HDMI connector | —, not published |
| Price | ||
| Launch price | $959.95 | —, not published |
| Size, to scale | ||
Front view, drawn at the same scale from each maker's published W×H (mm). | ||
| Smallest bag that fits | ||
| Body + standard zoom | Think Tank Mirrorless Mover 25 V2 Fits with 24-120 f/4 · View at B&H Photo Video | Think Tank Mirrorless Mover 20 V2 Fits body only · View at B&H Photo Video |
Sources
“23.5 x 15.7 mm CMOS sensor (Nikon DX format); 20.9 million effective pixels; 209 focus points; approx. 2360k-dot (XGA) OLED; 7.5-cm/3.0-in., approx. 1040k-dot vari-angle TFT touch-sensitive LCD”
“Primary color filter CMOS, 23.5mm x 15.6mm, Approx. 24.24 effective megapixels; Sensor-shift shake reduction (SR)(3-axis), 4 steps; Hybrid AF (Image plane phase-matching and Contrast detection); Full HD (1920x1080, 60p/30p/24p), MPEG4 AVC/H.264 (MOV); Rechargeable Battery DB-110; USB Type-C”
Spec values are the manufacturers' published figures, compared factually — we don't rank cameras. Fit verdicts are planning estimates from published interior dimensions, not guarantees. See methodology.
Feedback
Did this page help?
One tap tells us whether this fit page is useful.